Both are dongles, $179 against $119. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?
On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 561 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.
| Specification | Astell&Kern HC3 | iBasso DC04 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 125 mW | 125 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 27 mW | 27 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 13 mW | 13 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 6.7 mW | 6.7 mW |
| Output impedance | 2.0 Ω | 0.2 Ω |
| Output noise | not published | 2.5 µV unverified |
| Price | $179 | $119 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 561 | 561 |
A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.
| Load | Astell&Kern HC3 | iBasso DC04 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Upper bound | Upper bound |
| 150 Ω | Upper bound | Upper bound |
| 300 Ω | Upper bound | Upper bound |
| 600 Ω | Upper bound | Upper bound |
Neither maker publishes a power rating at any load. Both columns above are ceilings, worked out from a maximum output voltage on the assumption that the amplifier holds it into the load — the most flattering reading available for either. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position. Whichever of the two looks the stronger on power, the difference is unproven; the output-impedance and noise rows are the ones to go on.
What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.
On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.
89 headphones are left alone by the iBasso DC04 Pro under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Astell&Kern HC3 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 86 more).
561 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.
The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
Across all eight the two stay within half a decibel of each other, which is a way of saying that on power this pair is one product.
The hiss columns are empty for Astell&Kern HC3 and iBasso DC04 Pro because neither maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | Astell&Kern HC3 headroom | iBasso DC04 Pro headroom | Astell&Kern HC3 hiss | iBasso DC04 Pro hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +29 dB damping | +29 dB | not published | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +9 dB damping | +9 dB | not published | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +19 dB | +19 dB | not published | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +14 dB | +14 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +11 dB | +11 dB | not published | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +7 dB | +7 dB | not published | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +3 dB | +3 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | +1 dB | +1 dB | not published | not published |
The Astell&Kern HC3 costs $60 more than the iBasso DC04 Pro, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Astell&Kern HC3 handles and the iBasso DC04 Pro does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper iBasso DC04 Pro leaves 89 models alone under the one-eighth rule that the Astell&Kern HC3 does not.
Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.
Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Astell&Kern HC3 and iBasso DC04 Pro. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.