Burson Soloist 3X GT vs Holo Audio Bliss KTE

Both are desktop amplifiers, $2799 against $3798. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBurson Soloist 3X GTHolo Audio Bliss KTE
Power into 32Ω4.0 W3.0 W
Power into 150Ω650 mW600 mW
Power into 300Ω320 mW300 mW
Power into 600Ω160 mW150 mW
Output impedance0.5 Ω1.0 Ω
Output noise1.5 µV unverifiednot published
Price$2799$3798
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBurson Soloist 3X GTHolo Audio Bliss KTE
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedPublished
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating, which is less common than the table above makes it look: of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load and only 2 publish one at all four. Burson Soloist 3X GT publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω and at 300 Ω; Holo Audio Bliss KTE at 32 Ω and at 150 Ω. Every other row is worked out from those — between two published loads, or beyond them holding voltage constant, which understates rather than flatters.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 300 Ω only the Burson Soloist 3X GT figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

14 headphones are left alone by the Burson Soloist 3X GT under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Holo Audio Bliss KTE (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Burson Soloist 3X GT has +48 dB of headroom there against +43 dB. 5 dB is about 3.3 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Burson Soloist 3X GT and Holo Audio Bliss KTE because neither maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBurson Soloist 3X GT headroomHolo Audio Bliss KTE headroomBurson Soloist 3X GT hissHolo Audio Bliss KTE hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+48 dB+43 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+28 dB+23 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+35 dB+32 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+28 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+27 dB+25 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+21 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+17 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+17 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Holo Audio Bliss KTE costs $999 more than the Burson Soloist 3X GT, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Holo Audio Bliss KTE handles and the Burson Soloist 3X GT does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Burson Soloist 3X GT leaves 14 models alone under the one-eighth rule that the Holo Audio Bliss KTE does not.

Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Burson Soloist 3X GT and Holo Audio Bliss KTE. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑