Burson Soloist 3X GT vs SPL Phonitor xe

Both are desktop amplifiers, $2799 against $3000. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBurson Soloist 3X GTSPL Phonitor xe
Power into 32Ω4.0 W2.7 W
Power into 150Ω650 mW3.7 W
Power into 300Ω320 mW4.2 W
Power into 600Ω160 mW2.1 W
Output impedance0.5 Ω0.18 Ω
Output noise1.5 µV unverified5.48 µV
Price$2799$3000
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBurson Soloist 3X GTSPL Phonitor xe
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating, which is less common than the table above makes it look: of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load and only 2 publish one at all four. Burson Soloist 3X GT publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω and at 300 Ω; SPL Phonitor xe at 32 Ω. Every other row is worked out from those — between two published loads, or beyond them holding voltage constant, which understates rather than flatters.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω and at 300 Ω only the Burson Soloist 3X GT figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

1 headphone is left alone by the SPL Phonitor xe under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Burson Soloist 3X GT (Symphonium Titan).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Sennheiser HD 600: SPL Phonitor xe has +28 dB of headroom there against +17 dB. 11 dB is about 13 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Burson Soloist 3X GT because that maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBurson Soloist 3X GT headroomSPL Phonitor xe headroomBurson Soloist 3X GT hissSPL Phonitor xe hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+48 dB+43 dBnot published29 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+28 dB+23 dBnot published9 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+35 dB+35 dBnot published7 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+28 dB+39 dBnot published3 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+27 dB+24 dBnot published2 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+21 dB+32 dBnot published-4 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+17 dB+28 dBnot published-8 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+17 dB+17 dBnot published-10 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The SPL Phonitor xe costs $201 more than the Burson Soloist 3X GT. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model left alone under the one-eighth rule.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Burson Soloist 3X GT and SPL Phonitor xe. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑