Both are portable players, $499 against $369. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?
The FiiO M11S reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Shanling H5 on 565.
| Specification | FiiO M11S | Shanling H5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 200 mW | 227 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 44 mW | 48 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 23 mW | 24 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 12 mW | 12 mW |
| Output impedance | 1.5 Ω | 4.7 Ω |
| Output noise | 1.8 µV | not published |
| Price | $499 | $369 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 566 | 565 |
A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.
| Load | FiiO M11S | Shanling H5 |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Published | Published |
| 150 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 300 Ω | Published | Derived |
| 600 Ω | Derived | Derived |
Both makers publish a power rating, which is less common than the table above makes it look: of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load and only 2 publish one at all four. FiiO M11S publishes at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω; Shanling H5 at 32 Ω. Every other row is worked out from those — between two published loads, or beyond them holding voltage constant, which understates rather than flatters.
So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 300 Ω only the FiiO M11S figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.
What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.
1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the FiiO M11S but not on the Shanling H5 — Moondrop PARA.
335 headphones are left alone by the FiiO M11S under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling H5 (64 Audio Solo, 64 Audio U12t, 7Hz Legato, 332 more).
565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.
The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: FiiO M11S has +36 dB of headroom there against +32 dB. 4 dB is about 2.6 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.
The hiss columns are empty for Shanling H5 because that maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | FiiO M11S headroom | Shanling H5 headroom | FiiO M11S hiss | Shanling H5 hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +36 dB damping | +32 dB damping | 20 dB | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +16 dB damping | +12 dB damping | -0 dB | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +21 dB | +21 dB | -2 dB | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +16 dB | +17 dB | -7 dB | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +15 dB | +13 dB damping | -8 dB | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +10 dB | +10 dB | -14 dB | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +5 dB | +6 dB | -18 dB | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | +3 dB | +4 dB | -20 dB | not published |
The FiiO M11S costs $130 more than the Shanling H5. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model driven to 100 dB and 335 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.
Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.
Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.
Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: FiiO M11S and Shanling H5. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.