FiiO Q7 vs Shanling H7

Both are portable amplifiers, $750 against $829. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The FiiO Q7 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Shanling H7 on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFiiO Q7Shanling H7
Power into 32Ω550 mW450 mW
Power into 150Ω123 mW96 mW
Power into 300Ω65 mW48 mW
Power into 600Ω33 mW24 mW
Output impedance1.2 Ω1.0 Ω
Output noise2.8 µV1.5 µV
Price$750$829
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567566

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadFiiO Q7Shanling H7
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating, which is less common than the table above makes it look: of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load and only 2 publish one at all four. FiiO Q7 publishes at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω; Shanling H7 at 32 Ω. Every other row is worked out from those — between two published loads, or beyond them holding voltage constant, which understates rather than flatters.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 300 Ω only the FiiO Q7 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the FiiO Q7 but not on the Shanling H7 — Symphonium Titan.

23 headphones are left alone by the Shanling H7 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the FiiO Q7 (64 Audio Ocean, 64 Audio U18s, 64 Audio U6t, 20 more).

14 headphones stay below the audible-hiss threshold on the Shanling H7 but cross it on the FiiO Q7 (64 Audio Fourte, Campfire Audio Andromeda 10, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: FiiO Q7 has +20 dB of headroom there against +15 dB. 5 dB is about 3.3 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

Hiss is this source’s own noise, in decibels SPL, in that headphone — not a rating. Below about 20 dB SPL it is under the threshold of hearing in a quiet room; a negative figure means it is far below it.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsFiiO Q7 headroomShanling H7 headroomFiiO Q7 hissShanling H7 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+40 dB damping+35 dB23 dB18 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+20 dB damping+15 dB3 dB-2 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+25 dB+24 dB1 dB-4 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+21 dB+20 dB-3 dB-8 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+19 dB+16 dB-4 dB-9 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+14 dB+13 dB-10 dB-15 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+10 dB+9 dB-14 dB-19 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+8 dB+7 dB-16 dB-21 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Shanling H7 costs $79 more than the FiiO Q7. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 23 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule and 14 more models kept below the audible-hiss threshold.

It does not run one way only: the cheaper FiiO Q7 drives one model to 100 dB that the Shanling H7 does not, which is the part worth checking against your own headphones before paying the difference.

Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: FiiO Q7 and Shanling H7. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑