JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) vs JDS Labs Atom Amp 2

Both are desktop amplifiers, $99 against $129. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationJDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen)JDS Labs Atom Amp 2
Power into 32Ω1.0 W2.6 W
Power into 150Ω545 mW567 mW
Power into 300Ω272 mW284 mW
Power into 600Ω136 mW143 mW
Output impedance0.7 Ω0.7 Ω
Output noise1.99 µV1.33 µV
Price$99$129
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadJDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen)JDS Labs Atom Amp 2
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating, which is less common than the table above makes it look: of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load and only 2 publish one at all four. JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω; JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω. Every other row is worked out from those — between two published loads, or beyond them holding voltage constant, which understates rather than flatters.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 but not on the JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) — Symphonium Titan.

3 headphones stay below the audible-hiss threshold on the JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 but cross it on the JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) (Campfire Audio Clara, Shure SE846, Vision Ears Phönix Final Edition).

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 has +24 dB of headroom there against +20 dB. 4 dB is about 2.6 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

Hiss is this source’s own noise, in decibels SPL, in that headphone — not a rating. Below about 20 dB SPL it is under the threshold of hearing in a quiet room; a negative figure means it is far below it.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsJDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) headroomJDS Labs Atom Amp 2 headroomJDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) hissJDS Labs Atom Amp 2 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+38 dB+43 dB20 dB17 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+18 dB+23 dB0 dB-3 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+29 dB+32 dB-1 dB-5 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+27 dB+27 dB-6 dB-10 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+20 dB+24 dB-7 dB-11 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+20 dB+21 dB-13 dB-16 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+16 dB-17 dB-20 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+11 dB+15 dB-19 dB-22 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The JDS Labs Atom Amp 2 costs $30 more than the JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen). Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model driven to 100 dB and 3 more models kept below the audible-hiss threshold.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: JDS Labs Atom+ (2nd gen) and JDS Labs Atom Amp 2. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑