SSL 2 MkII vs Tascam US-4x4HR

Both are audio interfaces, $229 against $249. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The SSL 2 MkII reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here, the Tascam US-4x4HR on 553.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationSSL 2 MkIITascam US-4x4HR
Power into 32Ω374 mW45 mW
Power into 150Ω80 mW36 mW
Power into 300Ω40 mW24 mW
Power into 600Ω20 mW14 mW
Output impedance1 Ω51.5 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$229$249
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565553

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadSSL 2 MkIITascam US-4x4HR
32 ΩUpper boundPublished
150 ΩUpper boundDerived
300 ΩUpper boundDerived
600 ΩUpper boundDerived

These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. Tascam US-4x4HR publishes a power rating (at 32 Ω); SSL 2 MkII publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.

A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on SSL 2 MkII’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the SSL 2 MkII column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.

What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.

The headphones that tell them apart

12 headphones reach 100 dB on the SSL 2 MkII but not on the Tascam US-4x4HR — HiFiMAN HE-6se V2, HiFiMAN HE6 Remastered, HiFiMAN Susvara, 9 more.

546 headphones are left alone by the SSL 2 MkII under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Tascam US-4x4HR (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Ocean, 543 more).

553 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: SSL 2 MkII has +34 dB of headroom there against +25 dB. 9 dB is about 8.3 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for SSL 2 MkII and Tascam US-4x4HR because neither maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsSSL 2 MkII headroomTascam US-4x4HR headroomSSL 2 MkII hissTascam US-4x4HR hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+34 dB+25 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+14 dB+5 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+23 dB+16 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+19 dB+16 dB dampingnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+16 dB+6 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+12 dB+10 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+8 dB+6 dB dampingnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+6 dB-1 dB dampingnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Tascam US-4x4HR costs $20 more than the SSL 2 MkII, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Tascam US-4x4HR handles and the SSL 2 MkII does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper SSL 2 MkII drives 12 models to 100 dB and leaves 546 alone under the one-eighth rule that the Tascam US-4x4HR does not.

Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: SSL 2 MkII and Tascam US-4x4HR. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑