The AKG K702 is 62Ω at 92.9 dB/mW; the Dan Clark Audio Expanse is 26Ω at 90.0 dB/mW. This page is only about what they ask of an amplifier — not how they sound, which no specification on either sheet can tell you.
The Dan Clark Audio Expanse needs 2.9 dB more than the AKG K702 to reach the same loudness — 10 mW against 5.1 mW.
| Specification | AKG K702 | Dan Clark Audio Expanse |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 62 Ω | 26 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92.9 dB/mW | 90.0 dB/mW |
| Sensitivity (voltage) | 105.0 dB/V | 105.9 dB/V |
| Power for 100 dB | 5.1 mW | 10 mW |
| Voltage for 100 dB | 0.56 V | 0.51 V |
| Current for 100 dB | 9.1 mA | 19.6 mA |
| Highest source impedance that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule) | 7.75 Ω | 3.25 Ω |
| Sources that reach 100 dB out of 280 | 280 | 279 |
1 of the 280 sources has the power for the AKG K702 but not for the Dan Clark Audio Expanse — Steinberg UR22C.
1 source is low enough in output impedance for the AKG K702 under the one-eighth rule but not for the Dan Clark Audio Expanse (Shanling H5).
279 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both. That count is about power only — the output-impedance and hiss lines above are separate questions, and a source can pass this one and fail those.
The gap between these two in decibels does not change with volume — it is a property of the two headphones. What changes is the size of the numbers, and it changes fast: every 10 dB costs ten times the power. The row that matters is the one nearest the level you listen at, and for most people that is nearer the top of this table than the bottom.
The AKG K702 is more demanding than 89% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the Dan Clark Audio Expanse than 87%. Both figures use the same measure as the rest of the site: whichever runs out first against a 2 V, 100 mW dongle, voltage or power.
| dB SPL | AKG K702 power | AKG K702 voltage | Dan Clark Audio Expanse power | Dan Clark Audio Expanse voltage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 0.05 mW | 56 mV | 0.10 mW | 51 mV |
| 85 | 0.16 mW | 0.10 V | 0.32 mW | 91 mV |
| 90 | 0.51 mW | 0.18 V | 1.0 mW | 0.16 V |
| 95 | 1.6 mW | 0.32 V | 3.2 mW | 0.29 V |
| 100 | 5.1 mW | 0.56 V | 10 mW | 0.51 V |
| 105 | 16 mW | 1.00 V | 32 mW | 0.91 V |
105 dB is included because forum power figures are usually quoted there or higher. It is also a level that damages hearing in minutes — how many minutes is its own calculator.
| Source | Price | Headroom, AKG K702 | Headroom, Dan Clark Audio Expanse | Output impedance | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JadeAudio JA11 | $20 | 4.8 dB | 3.9 dB | 0.5 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO KA11 | $29 | 13.1 dB | 13.2 dB | 0.7 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO BTR11 | $36 | 4.8 dB | 5.2 dB | 0.5 Ω | 8.0 µV |
Of the 280 sources here, 279 reach 100 dB on both. That is the easy axis. 70 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both — the rest either fail one of those or never printed the number at all, and 207 of them are in the second group.
The cheapest of the 70 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 4.8 dB of headroom on the AKG K702 and 3.9 dB on the Dan Clark Audio Expanse, its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 7.75 Ω and 3.25 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 30 dB and 30 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.
Cheapest that satisfies three published numbers is not the same as best, and none of it is about how either headphone sounds. To put either model against a source this page does not mention, or to change the target loudness, use the amplifier matcher.
| Model | As printed | Tolerance | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKG K702 | 10 - 39800 Hz | not printed | not printed |
| Dan Clark Audio Expanse | “Yes, it has one” | not printed | not printed |
AKG prints 10 - 39800 Hz for the K702. Dan Clark Audio prints “Yes, it has one” for the Expanse.
Dan Clark Audio Expanse: The specification table has a frequency-response row. The value printed in it is the sentence "Yes, it has one".
One of these two sheets prints a range and the other prints a sentence declining to, and the second is the more informative of the two. The range given for the AKG K702 carries no tolerance, so it says nothing about how loud that model is at either end of it — which is exactly the objection the other sheet is making out loud.
None of this is a measurement. What each maker publishes, and what it is worth, is set out in the frequency response audit.
Each model has a page of its own with the full source list, the hiss estimate and the provenance of every figure above: AKG K702 and Dan Clark Audio Expanse. Every figure on this page comes from what AKG and Dan Clark Audio published, or is derived from it — what AKG publishes and what Dan Clark Audio publishes, both counted.