The AKG K702 is 62Ω at 92.9 dB/mW; the Sennheiser HD 800 is 300Ω at 96.8 dB/mW. This page is only about what they ask of an amplifier — not how they sound, which no specification on either sheet can tell you.
The AKG K702 needs 3.9 dB more than the Sennheiser HD 800 to reach the same loudness — 5.1 mW against 2.1 mW.
| Specification | AKG K702 | Sennheiser HD 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 62 Ω | 300 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 92.9 dB/mW | 96.8 dB/mW |
| Sensitivity (voltage) | 105.0 dB/V | 102.0 dB/V |
| Power for 100 dB | 5.1 mW | 2.1 mW |
| Voltage for 100 dB | 0.56 V | 0.79 V |
| Current for 100 dB | 9.1 mA | 2.6 mA |
| Highest source impedance that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule) | 7.75 Ω | 37.50 Ω |
| Sources that reach 100 dB out of 280 | 280 | 277 |
3 of the 280 sources have the power for the AKG K702 but not for the Sennheiser HD 800 — Apple USB-C dongle (EU), Steinberg UR22C, Sony NW-A306.
19 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Sennheiser HD 800 under the one-eighth rule but not for the AKG K702 (Zoom AMS-22, Arturia MiniFuse 2, Arturia MiniFuse 1, 16 more).
277 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both. That count is about power only — the output-impedance and hiss lines above are separate questions, and a source can pass this one and fail those.
The gap between these two in decibels does not change with volume — it is a property of the two headphones. What changes is the size of the numbers, and it changes fast: every 10 dB costs ten times the power. The row that matters is the one nearest the level you listen at, and for most people that is nearer the top of this table than the bottom.
The Sennheiser HD 800 is more demanding than 94% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the AKG K702 than 89%. Both figures use the same measure as the rest of the site: whichever runs out first against a 2 V, 100 mW dongle, voltage or power.
| dB SPL | AKG K702 power | AKG K702 voltage | Sennheiser HD 800 power | Sennheiser HD 800 voltage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 0.05 mW | 56 mV | 0.02 mW | 79 mV |
| 85 | 0.16 mW | 0.10 V | 0.07 mW | 0.14 V |
| 90 | 0.51 mW | 0.18 V | 0.21 mW | 0.25 V |
| 95 | 1.6 mW | 0.32 V | 0.66 mW | 0.45 V |
| 100 | 5.1 mW | 0.56 V | 2.1 mW | 0.79 V |
| 105 | 16 mW | 1.00 V | 6.6 mW | 1.41 V |
105 dB is included because forum power figures are usually quoted there or higher. It is also a level that damages hearing in minutes — how many minutes is its own calculator.
| Source | Price | Headroom, AKG K702 | Headroom, Sennheiser HD 800 | Output impedance | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JadeAudio JA11 | $20 | 4.8 dB | 1.9 dB | 0.5 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO KA11 | $29 | 13.1 dB | 10.2 dB | 0.7 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO BTR11 | $36 | 4.8 dB | 1.6 dB | 0.5 Ω | 8.0 µV |
Of the 280 sources here, 277 reach 100 dB on both. That is the easy axis. 70 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both — the rest either fail one of those or never printed the number at all, and 205 of them are in the second group.
The cheapest of the 70 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 4.8 dB of headroom on the AKG K702 and 1.9 dB on the Sennheiser HD 800, its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 7.75 Ω and 37.50 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 30 dB and 33 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.
Cheapest that satisfies three published numbers is not the same as best, and none of it is about how either headphone sounds. To put either model against a source this page does not mention, or to change the target loudness, use the amplifier matcher.
| Model | As printed | Tolerance | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKG K702 | 10 - 39800 Hz | not printed | not printed |
| Sennheiser HD 800 | nothing printed | — | — |
AKG prints 10 - 39800 Hz for the K702. Sennheiser prints nothing at all for the HD 800.
Sennheiser HD 800: Sennheiser still has a page for the HD 800, but it is a retired-product page: it offers a replacement model and spare parts and carries no specification table at all. The same site prints a full table, frequency response included, for the models it still sells.
So one side of this comparison has a frequency-response number and the other does not — which changes less than it looks. The range printed for the AKG K702 comes with no tolerance beside it, and a range without a ±dB figure says nothing about how loud the headphone is at either end of it: thirty decibels down at the bottom and the sentence would still be true. On the only reading that would have made it a specification, the two sheets say the same amount: nothing.
None of this is a measurement. What each maker publishes, and what it is worth, is set out in the frequency response audit.
Each model has a page of its own with the full source list, the hiss estimate and the provenance of every figure above: AKG K702 and Sennheiser HD 800. Every figure on this page comes from what AKG and Sennheiser published, or is derived from it — what AKG publishes and what Sennheiser publishes, both counted.