Both are audio interfaces, $249 against $199. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?
The Audient iD4 MkII reaches 100 dB on 561 of the 567 models here, the Audient EVO 8 on 543.
| Specification | Audient EVO 8 | Audient iD4 MkII |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 22 mW | 112 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 14 mW | 75 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 11 mW | 55 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 10 mW | 50 mW |
| Output impedance | 50 Ω | not published |
| Output noise | not published | not published |
| Price | $249 | $199 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 543 | 561 |
A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.
| Load | Audient EVO 8 | Audient iD4 MkII |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 150 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 300 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 600 Ω | Recomputed | Recomputed |
Neither column is a maker’s power rating at these loads. Of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load; these two do not, so every row above is derived — between or beyond the loads each maker did publish, holding output voltage as the maker’s own figures imply. The method understates rather than flatters, but it is still arithmetic rather than a rating.
What each of these labels means, and why a derived figure is still worth printing, is set out in how this data was built.
18 headphones reach 100 dB on the Audient iD4 MkII but not on the Audient EVO 8 — Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Noire, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Open, 15 more.
543 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.
The counts above say how many models the two treat differently. This says by how much. The same 8 headphones appear on every page of this kind, ordered from the easiest to drive to the hardest, so a row can be read across pages as well as across columns. Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
The widest gap on the list is the Audeze LCD-2 Classic: Audient iD4 MkII has +22 dB of headroom there against +15 dB. 7 dB is about 5.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.
The hiss columns are empty for Audient EVO 8 and Audient iD4 MkII because neither maker publishes no output noise figure. That is a gap in the specification, not a quiet amplifier, and it is left blank here rather than filled with a plausible number.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | Audient EVO 8 headroom | Audient iD4 MkII headroom | Audient EVO 8 hiss | Audient iD4 MkII hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +22 dB damping | +29 dB | not published | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +2 dB damping | +9 dB | not published | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +15 dB damping | +22 dB | not published | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +13 dB damping | +20 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +4 dB damping | +11 dB | not published | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +8 dB | +15 dB | not published | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +2 dB damping | +9 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | -3 dB damping | +4 dB | not published | not published |
The Audient EVO 8 costs $50 more than the Audient iD4 MkII, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Audient EVO 8 handles and the Audient iD4 MkII does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Audient iD4 MkII drives 18 models to 100 dB that the Audient EVO 8 does not.
Everything in this paragraph counts only figures the two makers published. An advantage on an axis one of them leaves blank cannot be counted, and is not counted — how often that happens is its own page.
Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Audient EVO 8 and Audient iD4 MkII. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.