Audient iD4 MkII: power output and what it will drive

The Audient iD4 MkII is an audio interface at $199. It delivers 112 mW into 32Ω and 55 mW into 300Ω, which ranks it 206 of 280 for raw power among the sources in this database.

Measured at 100 dB SPL it has comfortable headroom on 528 of the 567 dynamic and planar headphones catalogued here, enough but not generous on 29, only marginal on 4 and not enough power for 6. Power is published at 30Ω, 62Ω, 600Ω; the rest of the table is derived from those figures. Output impedance is not published. Output noise is not published, so the hiss estimate cannot be run.

What it actually puts out

TypeAudio interface
Price$199
Power into 32 Ω112 mW
Power into 150 Ω75 mW
Power into 300 Ω55 mW
Power into 600 Ω50 mW
Output impedancenot published
Output noisenot published
Comfortable headroom on 528 of 567 headphones (93%) · short of power on 6

Where these numbers come from

This entry does not repeat the manufacturer's printed power figures. It uses 111 mW into 30Ω, 140 mW into 62Ω, 50 mW into 600Ω.

The power figures above are not the ones Audient prints, and that is deliberate. Audient publishes a peak voltage, an RMS voltage and a power figure on the same line — and the power is twice what the RMS voltage gives. On the iD4 MkII, 1.827 Vrms into 30Ω is 111 mW; Audient prints 223 mW. The same factor runs through all nine published points across the iD4 MkII, iD24 and EVO 4 — six of them within 1% of 2.00 and the other three 3–6% below it, the sort of spread two- and three-digit printed figures produce — so it is systematic rather than a slip on one line. Two things would produce it: squaring the peak voltage instead of the RMS one, or quoting both channels added together. The arithmetic cannot tell those apart — Vpk²/R and 2·Vrms²/R are the same number — and Audient does not say which it is. So this database does not guess at the cause. It applies one rule that follows straight from their own document: the power here is Vrms²/R computed from the RMS voltage Audient prints beside each load. That comes out at half the printed power, give or take the rounding of their figures. The voltages themselves are untouched, and they are what the matching maths on this page relies on.

Derivation holds output voltage steady between and beyond the published loads rather than output power, because that is what an amplifier actually does. The full method is written up here.

Source: support.audient.com, audient.com.

LoadPowerStatusHow it was arrived at
30 Ω111 mWRecomputedworked out here from the voltage the manufacturer printed on the same line, because its own power figure does not follow from it
32 Ω112 mWDerivedworked out between two published loads, holding output voltage linear between them
62 Ω140 mWRecomputedworked out here from the voltage the manufacturer printed on the same line, because its own power figure does not follow from it
150 Ω75 mWDerivedworked out between two published loads, holding output voltage linear between them
300 Ω55 mWDerivedworked out between two published loads, holding output voltage linear between them
600 Ω50 mWRecomputedworked out here from the voltage the manufacturer printed on the same line, because its own power figure does not follow from it

Against 40 well-known headphones

Ordered from easiest to hardest to drive. Headroom is measured at 100 dB SPL, which is louder than almost anyone listens — a small negative number means the source still plays loud, just without reserve for peaks.

These figures come from each manufacturer's own sensitivity rating. A handful of planars — the HiFiMAN Susvara and the Abyss AB-1266 in particular — are widely reported to need far more than their published sensitivity implies, so treat a bare pass on those as optimistic rather than settled.

HeadphoneImpedanceSensitivityNeedsHeadroomVerdict
Shure SE8469 Ω114.0 dB/mW0.04 mW+29 dBComfortable
64 Audio U12t12.6 Ω108.0 dB/mW0.16 mW+25 dBComfortable
Shure SE21517 Ω107.0 dB/mW0.20 mW+25 dBComfortable
Moondrop Aria32 Ω107.1 dB/mW0.19 mW+28 dBComfortable
Audeze LCD-X 202120 Ω103.0 dB/mW0.50 mW+22 dBComfortable
Truthear Hexa20.5 Ω103.1 dB/mW0.49 mW+22 dBComfortable
Sennheiser IE 20018 Ω101.6 dB/mW0.69 mW+20 dBComfortable
Sony MDR-750663 Ω106.0 dB/mW0.25 mW+27 dBComfortable
Meze 99 Classics32 Ω103.0 dB/mW0.50 mW+24 dBComfortable
Focal Clear MG55 Ω104.0 dB/mW0.40 mW+25 dBComfortable
Philips SHP950032 Ω101.0 dB0.79 mW+22 dBComfortable
Focal Utopia80 Ω104.0 dB/mW0.40 mW+25 dBComfortable
Meze Empyrean32 Ω100.0 dB1.0 mW+21 dBComfortable
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω94.0 dB4.0 mW+9 dBEnough
Etymotic ER2SE15 Ω96.0 dB/mW2.5 mW+13 dBComfortable
AKG K37132 Ω99.1 dB/mW1.2 mW+20 dBComfortable
Audio-Technica ATH-M50X38 Ω99.0 dB/mW1.3 mW+20 dBComfortable
Beyerdynamic DT 900 Pro X48 Ω100.0 dB/mW1.0 mW+21 dBComfortable
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω101.0 dB/mW0.79 mW+22 dBComfortable
Grado SR80x38 Ω98.0 dB/mW1.6 mW+19 dBComfortable
Sennheiser HD 560S120 Ω100.8 dB/mW0.83 mW+20 dBComfortable
HiFiMAN Edition XS18 Ω92.0 dB6.3 mW+10 dBComfortable
HiFiMAN Arya Stealth32 Ω94.0 dB4.0 mW+15 dBComfortable
Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed13 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+7 dBEnough
Audeze LCD-514 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+7 dBEnough
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω102.0 dB/mW0.63 mW+20 dBComfortable
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω91.0 dB7.9 mW+11 dBComfortable
HiFiMAN Sundara32 Ω92.0 dB6.3 mW+13 dBComfortable
Dan Clark Audio Stealth23 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+9 dBEnough
Fostex T50RP MK350 Ω92.0 dB/mW6.3 mW+13 dBComfortable
AKG K70262 Ω92.9 dB/mW5.1 mW+14 dBComfortable
ZMF Verite Closed300 Ω99.0 dB/mW1.3 mW+16 dBComfortable
Sennheiser HD 650300 Ω97.8 dB/mW1.7 mW+15 dBComfortable
Sennheiser HD 800S300 Ω96.8 dB/mW2.1 mW+14 dBComfortable
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω96.0 dB2.5 mW+14 dBComfortable
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω98.0 dB/mW1.6 mW+15 dBComfortable
ZMF Atrium300 Ω96.0 dB/mW2.5 mW+13 dBComfortable
Abyss AB-1266 Phi TC50 Ω88.0 dB/mW16 mW+9 dBEnough
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω91.8 dB/mW6.6 mW+9 dBEnough
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω83.0 dB50 mW+4 dBEnough

Will it hiss?

The manufacturer does not publish an output noise figure for this source, so the hiss estimate that runs on every other page here cannot be run on this one. Rather than substitute a plausible number, this page leaves the question open.

If you know the noise figure from a measurement you trust, the hiss calculator takes it directly and tells you where that noise lands in your own in-ears.

Output impedance and the one-eighth rule

The manufacturer does not publish an output impedance for this source. That is the one number that decides whether it leaves your headphones alone or acts as a tone control, so its absence matters more than it looks: without it, nothing here can tell you how this source will behave with a multi-driver in-ear.

If you find a measured figure you trust, the checker will work out the consequence for any headphone.

The cheapest thing here that does the same job

SourceTypePriceInto 300 ΩOutput impedanceOutput noise
FiiO KA11USB dongle$2922 mW0.7 Ω1.7 µV
ddHiFi TC35ALUSB dongle$4622 mWnot publishednot published
ddHiFi TC35AirUSB dongle$4622 mWnot publishednot published

Of the 280 sources here, 46 do everything the Audient iD4 MkII does as a headphone output: reach 100 dB on every headphone it reaches. The cheapest of them is the FiiO KA11 at $29, against this one’s $199 — $170 less, and a USB dongle rather than an audio interface.

The cheaper one also publishes an output impedance and a noise figure, which the Audient iD4 MkII does not — so on the paperwork it is ahead, not merely level.

This counts a headphone output and nothing else. Inputs, converters, microphone preamps, balanced outputs, the volume control, the case and the warranty are all outside it, and any of them can be the reason to buy the dearer box. What the count does say is that the three numbers a maker can be held to do not separate them.

Other audio interfaces at a similar price

Or put any two side by side in the source comparison tool, or run your own headphones through the amplifier matcher. Or see every Audient source in the database, and how much of what this site says about them came from Audient’s own documents.

↑