AKG K371 vs Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω): which needs more amplifier?

The AKG K371 is 32Ω at 99.1 dB/mW; the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) is 250Ω at 96.0 dB (no reference unit printed). This page is only about what they ask of an amplifier — not how they sound, which no specification on either sheet can tell you.

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) needs 3.1 dB more than the AKG K371 to reach the same loudness — 2.5 mW against 1.2 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationAKG K371Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω)
Impedance32 Ω250 Ω
Sensitivity99.1 dB/mW96.0 dB
Sensitivity (voltage)114.0 dB/V102.0 dB/V
Power for 100 dB1.2 mW2.5 mW
Voltage for 100 dB0.20 V0.79 V
Current for 100 dB6.2 mA3.2 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
4.00 Ω31.25 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
280277

One caution before reading the rows. Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) printed a decibel figure with no reference unit, so this page reads it as per milliwatt. If it is really per volt, that model needs far more than the table says. Why the two readings differ by so much.

Where the two part company

3 of the 280 sources have the power for the AKG K371 but not for the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) — Apple USB-C dongle (EU), Steinberg UR22C, Sony NW-A306.

19 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) under the one-eighth rule but not for the AKG K371 (Zoom AMS-22, Arturia MiniFuse 2, Arturia MiniFuse 1, 16 more).

1 source stays below the audible-hiss threshold with the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) but crosses it with the AKG K371 (Schiit Mjolnir 3).

277 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both. That count is about power only — the output-impedance and hiss lines above are separate questions, and a source can pass this one and fail those.

What each one needs from 80 to 105 dB

The gap between these two in decibels does not change with volume — it is a property of the two headphones. What changes is the size of the numbers, and it changes fast: every 10 dB costs ten times the power. The row that matters is the one nearest the level you listen at, and for most people that is nearer the top of this table than the bottom.

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) is more demanding than 95% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the AKG K371 than 57%. Both figures use the same measure as the rest of the site: whichever runs out first against a 2 V, 100 mW dongle, voltage or power.

dB SPLAKG K371 powerAKG K371 voltageBeyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) powerBeyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω) voltage
800.01 mW20 mV0.03 mW79 mV
850.04 mW35 mV0.08 mW0.14 V
900.12 mW63 mV0.25 mW0.25 V
950.39 mW0.11 V0.79 mW0.45 V
1001.2 mW0.20 V2.5 mW0.79 V
1053.9 mW0.35 V7.9 mW1.41 V

105 dB is included because forum power figures are usually quoted there or higher. It is also a level that damages hearing in minutes — how many minutes is its own calculator.

The cheapest source that satisfies both

SourcePriceHeadroom, AKG K371Headroom, Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω)Output impedanceNoise
JadeAudio JA11$2013.9 dB1.8 dB0.5 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO KA11$2922.1 dB10.2 dB0.7 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO BTR11$3613.9 dB1.6 dB0.5 Ω8.0 µV

Of the 280 sources here, 277 reach 100 dB on both. That is the easy axis. 69 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both — the rest either fail one of those or never printed the number at all, and 205 of them are in the second group.

The cheapest of the 69 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 13.9 dB of headroom on the AKG K371 and 1.8 dB on the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω), its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 4.00 Ω and 31.25 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 21 dB and 33 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.

Cheapest that satisfies three published numbers is not the same as best, and none of it is about how either headphone sounds. To put either model against a source this page does not mention, or to change the target loudness, use the amplifier matcher.

What each sheet prints, and what it is worth

ModelAs printedToleranceStandard
AKG K3715 - 40000not printednot printed
Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω)5 - 35.000 Hznot printednot printed

AKG prints 5 - 40000 for the K371. Beyerdynamic prints 5 - 35.000 Hz for the DT 990 Pro (250Ω).

Neither range has a tolerance printed beside it, and that is the whole of what this section can tell you. A wider range on one sheet is not deeper bass or more treble on that headphone: without a tolerance, neither number says how loud either model is at the ends of its own range, so the difference between the two is a difference between two pieces of marketing copy. A ±dB figure is what turns a range into a specification, and of the 490 models whose maker prints a range, 58 print it.

None of this is a measurement. What each maker publishes, and what it is worth, is set out in the frequency response audit.

Both pages in full

Each model has a page of its own with the full source list, the hiss estimate and the provenance of every figure above: AKG K371 and Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (250Ω). Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones AKG and Beyerdynamic never published — what AKG publishes and what Beyerdynamic publishes, both counted.

↑