Generic CX31993 dongles: power output and what it will drive

The Generic CX31993 dongles is a USB dongle at $12. It delivers 60 mW into 32Ω and 9.0 mW into 300Ω, which ranks it 245 of 280 for raw power among the sources in this database.

Measured at 100 dB SPL it has comfortable headroom on 446 of the 567 dynamic and planar headphones catalogued here, enough but not generous on 101, only marginal on 6 and not enough power for 14. No manufacturer stands behind these. They are built on a Conexant/Synaptics CX31993 chip whose datasheet is behind an NDA, sold under dozens of names, and the specifications printed on marketplace listings are seller copy. Treat every number here as an indication of the type, not of the dongle in your hand.

What it actually puts out

TypeUSB dongle
Price$12
Power into 32 Ω60 mW
Power into 150 Ω18 mW
Power into 300 Ω9.0 mW
Power into 600 Ω5.0 mW
Output impedance1.5 Ω unverified
Output noise8 µV unverified
Comfortable headroom on 446 of 567 headphones (79%) · short of power on 14

Where these numbers come from

Nothing in the table above could be traced to a document this manufacturer publishes. The figures come from the material this database was first built from — independent measurement and reviewer reports — and every one of them is labelled unverified for that reason. They are being re-sourced one model at a time, and this page will change when the maker publishes something or a document turns up.

Nothing here is derived: every figure in the table is either a number the maker published at that exact load or a number marked unverified. The method behind the labels is written up here.

LoadPowerStatusHow it was arrived at
32 Ω60 mWUnverifiedcollected from manufacturer and reviewer material but not yet traced to a single published document
150 Ω18 mWUnverifiedcollected from manufacturer and reviewer material but not yet traced to a single published document
300 Ω9.0 mWUnverifiedcollected from manufacturer and reviewer material but not yet traced to a single published document
600 Ω5.0 mWUnverifiedcollected from manufacturer and reviewer material but not yet traced to a single published document

Against 40 well-known headphones

Ordered from easiest to hardest to drive. Headroom is measured at 100 dB SPL, which is louder than almost anyone listens — a small negative number means the source still plays loud, just without reserve for peaks.

These figures come from each manufacturer's own sensitivity rating. A handful of planars — the HiFiMAN Susvara and the Abyss AB-1266 in particular — are widely reported to need far more than their published sensitivity implies, so treat a bare pass on those as optimistic rather than settled.

HeadphoneImpedanceSensitivityNeedsHeadroomVerdict
Shure SE8469 Ω114.0 dB/mW0.04 mW+26 dBComfortable audible hiss, damping
64 Audio U12t12.6 Ω108.0 dB/mW0.16 mW+22 dBComfortable audible hiss
Shure SE21517 Ω107.0 dB/mW0.20 mW+22 dBComfortable audible hiss
Moondrop Aria32 Ω107.1 dB/mW0.19 mW+25 dBComfortable audible hiss
Audeze LCD-X 202120 Ω103.0 dB/mW0.50 mW+19 dBComfortable audible hiss
Truthear Hexa20.5 Ω103.1 dB/mW0.49 mW+19 dBComfortable audible hiss
Sennheiser IE 20018 Ω101.6 dB/mW0.69 mW+17 dBComfortable audible hiss
Sony MDR-750663 Ω106.0 dB/mW0.25 mW+21 dBComfortable audible hiss
Meze 99 Classics32 Ω103.0 dB/mW0.50 mW+21 dBComfortable audible hiss
Focal Clear MG55 Ω104.0 dB/mW0.40 mW+20 dBComfortable audible hiss
Philips SHP950032 Ω101.0 dB0.79 mW+19 dBComfortable audible hiss
Focal Utopia80 Ω104.0 dB/mW0.40 mW+18 dBComfortable audible hiss
Meze Empyrean32 Ω100.0 dB1.0 mW+18 dBComfortable audible hiss
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω94.0 dB4.0 mW+6 dBEnough audible hiss, damping
Etymotic ER2SE15 Ω96.0 dB/mW2.5 mW+10 dBComfortable audible hiss
AKG K37132 Ω99.1 dB/mW1.2 mW+17 dBComfortable audible hiss
Audio-Technica ATH-M50X38 Ω99.0 dB/mW1.3 mW+16 dBComfortable audible hiss
Beyerdynamic DT 900 Pro X48 Ω100.0 dB/mW1.0 mW+16 dBComfortable audible hiss
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω101.0 dB/mW0.79 mW+16 dBComfortable audible hiss
Grado SR80x38 Ω98.0 dB/mW1.6 mW+15 dBComfortable audible hiss
Sennheiser HD 560S120 Ω100.8 dB/mW0.83 mW+14 dBComfortable faint hiss
HiFiMAN Edition XS18 Ω92.0 dB6.3 mW+7 dBEnough faint hiss
HiFiMAN Arya Stealth32 Ω94.0 dB4.0 mW+12 dBComfortable faint hiss
Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed13 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+4 dBEnough faint hiss
Audeze LCD-514 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+4 dBEnough faint hiss
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω102.0 dB/mW0.63 mW+12 dBComfortable faint hiss
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω91.0 dB7.9 mW+8 dBEnough faint hiss
HiFiMAN Sundara32 Ω92.0 dB6.3 mW+10 dBEnough faint hiss
Dan Clark Audio Stealth23 Ω90.0 dB/mW10 mW+6 dBEnough faint hiss
Fostex T50RP MK350 Ω92.0 dB/mW6.3 mW+8 dBEnough faint hiss
AKG K70262 Ω92.9 dB/mW5.1 mW+8 dBEnough faint hiss
ZMF Verite Closed300 Ω99.0 dB/mW1.3 mW+9 dBEnough faint hiss
Sennheiser HD 650300 Ω97.8 dB/mW1.7 mW+7 dBEnough faint hiss
Sennheiser HD 800S300 Ω96.8 dB/mW2.1 mW+6 dBEnough faint hiss
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω96.0 dB2.5 mW+6 dBEnough faint hiss
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω98.0 dB/mW1.6 mW+6 dBEnough
ZMF Atrium300 Ω96.0 dB/mW2.5 mW+6 dBEnough
Abyss AB-1266 Phi TC50 Ω88.0 dB/mW16 mW+4 dBEnough
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω91.8 dB/mW6.6 mW+1 dBMarginal
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω83.0 dB50 mW-2 dBNot enough

Will it hiss?

At 8 µV of output noise, here is where that noise lands in the five most revealing in-ears in the database.

That noise figure has not been traced to a document from the maker, so the levels below are as good as the number they start from.

This one hisses. With the most sensitive in-ears in the database its own noise lands around 39 dB SPL, which you will hear between tracks and in quiet passages.

In-earImpedanceSensitivityHiss level
Simgot EA50016 Ω141.0 dB/V39 dB SPL
Tanchjim EA FORCE17 Ω137.7 dB/V36 dB SPL
Shure SE8469 Ω134.5 dB/V33 dB SPL
Campfire Audio Clara13.3 Ω134.1 dB/V32 dB SPL
64 Audio Fourte10 Ω134.0 dB/V32 dB SPL

Output impedance and the one-eighth rule

At 1.5Ω output impedance, the one-eighth rule says this source suits headphones of 12.0Ω and above. 51 of the 567 models here fall below that. Most of them are multi-driver in-ears, and the mismatch tilts the frequency response audibly rather than subtly.

That output impedance has not been traced to a document from the maker, so the count above is only as good as the number it starts from.

The rule is a rule of thumb, not physics: a source impedance below one eighth of the headphone's keeps the interaction under about 1 dB. The checker works it out for any pair.

The cheapest thing here that does the same job

Nothing cheaper in this database does everything the Generic CX31993 dongles does. Of the 280 sources here, not one at a lower price will reach 100 dB on every headphone it reaches. That is a plain result and it is not the usual one — most of the catalogue has something cheaper that matches it.

It is worth knowing how that was counted. The maker publishes no output impedance and no noise figure for this one, and an axis nobody published is an axis nothing had to match. The result above rests on the figures that exist.

This counts a headphone output and nothing else. Inputs, converters, microphone preamps, balanced outputs, the volume control, the case and the warranty are all outside it, and any of them can be the reason to buy the dearer box. What the count does say is that the three numbers a maker can be held to do not separate them.

Other dongles at a similar price

Worked out in advance against its closest rivals: vs Apple USB-C dongle (EU) · vs Apple USB-C dongle (US). Each of those pages lists the headphones that tell the two apart.

Or put any two side by side in the source comparison tool, or run your own headphones through the amplifier matcher.

↑